Key in the agreement is for the
SJDM to allow students graduating with a diploma or advanced diploma from the
GPU J-School into the second and third year respectively pending the meet the
entry requirements of the University of The Gambia (Photo Credit: GPU School of Journalism) |
By Alagie Jinkang
The
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) purportedly signed
between the Gambia Press Union and the School of Journalism and Digital Media,
University of the Gambia and which unjustifiably discriminate its own former
students, is highly unacceptable and a separatist move.
The
previous students of the Professional Reporters Diploma Program have transcended
beyond all doubts to make themselves not only the first trained Gambian journalists
under our own initiatives, but also the best to have undergone any such
training.
The
program to be later qualified as an advanced diploma was a two-year intensive
course. The 12 students, who progressed through sea and mountain, were
certified and continue to tirelessly work in our media fraternity using their
expertise to make us all proud of their 24 months adventure.
Some of
them are editors, instructors and some made their ways to the UTG and other
institutions contributing to national development and the advancement of our
national media landscape particularly.
The students,
who have been admitted under what could be seen as very outstanding natural
selection methods, are still some of those best brains any union would do
everything to support in their professional aspirations.
To have
those people fallaciously segregated in the MoU is both unfair and
self-defeating for the institutions involved and for the general goodness of
the nation.
I write
my grievances not only as a friend or colleague but most importantly as a
Gambian. I vehemently believe our national progress is paused by some of these
transcendental nonsenses.
To
deliberately exclude the PRDP from this gallant opportunity will be
counterproductive especially for the GPU who has demonstrated nothing but oblivion
for what they called a success today.
I would
expect the PRDP students to be the main benefactors of this MoU. I did not get
it wrong, it was a foul played by SJDM and co-authored by the GPU.
According
to the key MoU against which I write, “… is for the SJDM to allow students
graduating with a diploma from the GPU J-School into the second and third year
respectively pending they meet the entry requirements of the University of The
Gambia.”
That
statement is irrationally conjured and unjustifiable under the very conditions
the GPU and the UTG rightfully should know.
The MoU
would have solicited different voices including those it intentionally worked
against today, before it is signed and proclaimed worthy of celebration (for
those who do not know the bigger picture.)
But, what
is really behind this so-called MoU? To start with, the first badge of the GPU
School of Journalism had had 2 years intensive course (some with even four
years’ experience when they joined.) Now, the MoU straightforwardly without
neither consultation nor convincing points to make those PRDP graduates feel
represented.
I am
genuinely annoyed for what I consider an irrational behaviour in both academic and economic sense
of the MoU. To accept the new students who are going to spend one year or less
for an advanced diploma might be understandable, but will be unforgivable for
restricting the former graduates from the MoU. Because
the MoU is either enunciating that the Advanced Diploma earned by the previous batch
is substandard than the one foreseen or, it is just another managerial
incompetence of our bureaucratic DNA.
Students with the late lecturer Irmelin Mei Viegas during a field trip (Photo Credit: Irmelin/FacebookTimeline) |
Yet, we
cannot ignore the foolish nature of such agreements; they are not natural laws
nor are they fixed and binding. Therefore, without any iota of doubt, I
challenge the UTG and the GPU to revisit their drawing board and do what
actually has to be done. Such an MoU voices out what we must all endeavour to
avoid in our daily institutional discrepancies.
If the
MoU is motivated by a national agenda, why exclude the PRDP batch? If it
follows another FTI (fast track initiative) paradigm, it would do better by
including this group of devoted and outstanding professionals who have spent two
good years for the same diploma that now weigh inconsistently.
But until
then, the MoU is an authored unjustifiable discrimination that might hunt us
for long. We must start to solve our problems by facing them as they are rather
than ignoring them. We cannot wish to solve our problems by temporally ignoring
them.
Let’s
look at it this way for the perfect sense of dispute resolution. Both the
excluded and the included are nationals of The Gambia and have shown their
desires to further their professional interests to the UTG.
The
excluded (PRDP graduates) have demonstrated their will and academic potentials
to undergo a degree program in journalism at the UTG after SUCCESSFULLY
completely the Advanced Diploma Program (now reduced to less than 1 year or
so.)
From this
picture, (excluding all the expenses that the GPU and its sponsors must have
taken to make it what we are all unanimously proud of today as the GPU School
of Journalism,) it will be nonchalant to be oblivious of those PRDP graduates
who have sacrificed their time and resources to crossed the sea and climbed the
mountain at both personal and collective levels to make the school of
journalism come true.
Prof. Irmelin Mei Vegas must be gravely disappointed in her
grave for what I genuinely believe will be seen by her as a gross injustice
after all her personal efforts to let the GPU to this level. She is one
professor I will never forget and shall always be proud of. Rest in Peace Prof.
Irmelin Mei Vegas.
What do
we have to celebrate about this MoU if those who led to the success story are
neglected? And, readers be informed that, I am deliberately using every word
and construction here, if I am found naughty, I will bear the consequences. I
know very little about the GPU to unfoundedly allege them of anything, but I
will not surrender my intention to fight what seems to me as a brutal injustice.
I will
have to appear if need be, before the national courts to settle the matter and
establish the right playing cards for all. The UTG School of Journalism can no
doubts have their own admission criteria, but it will be biased if people who
have fulfilled all the requirements of the GPU for two years can just be
absurdly ignored and nothing whatsoever is done about it to make them covered
in the MoU.
For the
PRDP graduates to have to undergo another four years of instruction for a
degree in Journalism after all what they’ve underwent, can at best be seen as
the lack of transparency and effort to reward the right individuals for their
rightful achievements.
To
exclude the PRDPfrom this MoU is outrageous and bad for the nation. It does not
matter even if it affects only 15 capable people who still work in journalism
or other national and personal adventures.
The
resources the UTG will need for these people if they are included in the MoU,
would be less expensive and more of national interest. The UTG and the GPU will
better enhance their academic and professional aspirations if they should
consider the PRDP graduates.
To add
another four years to what these people have already accomplished will be
contrary to any FTI approach or any developmental agenda as much as my stupid
brain is concern. The last thing I will do is to discourage such people from
achieving their true potentials and dreams but, as much as I know these
colleagues of mine such an MoU is foresight killing for those unlawfully discriminated.
The GPU
and the UTG need to strongly come out and justify beyond what I can imagine and
take as irrational towards the good of those our brothers and sisters affected
by this so-called MoU and how this will
hunt our national identity.
Alagie Jinkang is a PH.D Candidate, Faculty of Law, University of Palermo, Italy. He is a member of the first batch of students (the PRDP) of the GPU School of Journalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment
The views expressed in this section are the authors' own. It does not represent The North Bank Evening Standard (TNBES)'s editorial policy. Also, TNBES is not responsible for content on external links.